Public Relations of the Cold War
Thursday, 1 December 2011 to Saturday, 3 December 2011Location: CRASSH, 17 Mill Lane, and Mill Lane Lecture Room 9, Cambridge.
Conveners
Hannah Higgin (University of Cambridge)
Mark Miller (University of Cambridge)
Martin Albers (University of Cambridge)
Zhong Zhong Chen (LSE)
Summary
The conference seeks to examine the 'selling' of Cold War-motivated policies to national audiences during the second half of the twentieth century. At its core, the Cold War was a global ideological conflict, pitting two uncompromising and often messianic systems against one another, systems which both rejected traditional European imperialism and which claimed to provide the ultimate solution to problems of global instability and human inequality.
However, stemming from dual foundations of 'making the world safe for democracy' on one hand and the Marxist theory of false consciousness on the other, ideological diversions appeared on both sides of the Cold War divide in order to confront changing international climates and maintain the respective 'Grand Strategies' of global transformation in line with each side's chosen systems of government and society.
When faced with complicated issues, such as internment, foreign intervention or more general limits to human rights, the decisions were often inconsistent with previous proclamations and in stark contrast to the guiding principles of the system. In these instances (for example, the support for a dictator like Pinochet or the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia) justifications for questionable actions were created and corresponding discussions held to decide which decisions could be made public and which must remain classified. By examining these controversial issues, one can not only understand how official policy was transmitted through the mass media, but also dissect the relationship between political ideology and the larger issue of Grand Strategy.
While growing attention is paid to the public diplomacy of the Cold War, less attention is paid specifically to how governments sold policies to their own domestic public. This conference aims to stimulate innovative and interdisciplinary thinking and dialogue on this topic and to reach out to new networks of interest and new publics.
However, stemming from dual foundations of 'making the world safe for democracy' on one hand and the Marxist theory of false consciousness on the other, ideological diversions appeared on both sides of the Cold War divide in order to confront changing international climates and maintain the respective 'Grand Strategies' of global transformation in line with each side's chosen systems of government and society.
When faced with complicated issues, such as internment, foreign intervention or more general limits to human rights, the decisions were often inconsistent with previous proclamations and in stark contrast to the guiding principles of the system. In these instances (for example, the support for a dictator like Pinochet or the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia) justifications for questionable actions were created and corresponding discussions held to decide which decisions could be made public and which must remain classified. By examining these controversial issues, one can not only understand how official policy was transmitted through the mass media, but also dissect the relationship between political ideology and the larger issue of Grand Strategy.
While growing attention is paid to the public diplomacy of the Cold War, less attention is paid specifically to how governments sold policies to their own domestic public. This conference aims to stimulate innovative and interdisciplinary thinking and dialogue on this topic and to reach out to new networks of interest and new publics.
Sponsors

Supported by the Centre for Research in the
Arts, Humanities and Social
Sciences (CRASSH), the Faculty of History at the University of Cambridge and the International History Department at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
Accommodation for non-paper giving delegates
We are unable to arrange accommodation, however, the following websites may be of help.
Visit
Cambridge
Cambridge Rooms
University of Cambridge accommodation webpage
Administrative assistance: Helga Brandt (Conference Programme Manager, CRASSH)
